Warning: fopen(/home/virtual/epih/journal/upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-12.txt): failed to open stream: Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 95 Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 96 Nationwide trends in the incidence of tuberculosis among people with disabilities in Korea: a nationwide serial cross-sectional study
Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Epidemiol Health : Epidemiology and Health

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search
Advanced Search
mobile menu button

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Epidemiol Health > Volume 44; 2022 > Article
Original Article
 Nationwide trends in the incidence of tuberculosis among people with disabilities in Korea: a nationwide serial cross-sectional study
Jinsoo Min1*orcid, So Young Kim2,3*orcid, Jong Eun Park3orcid, Yeon Yong Kim4,5orcid, Jong Hyock Park3,6orcid
Epidemiol Health 2022;44:e2022098.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2022098
Published online: October 28, 2022

1Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea

2Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea

3Institute of Health & Science Convergence, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea

4Big Data Steering Department, National Health Insurance Service, Wonju, Korea

5Drug Evaluation Department, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Cheongju, Korea

6Department of Preventive Medicine, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Korea

Correspondence: Jong Hyock Park Department of Preventive Medicine, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, 1 Chungdae-ro, Seowon-gu, Cheongju 28644, Korea E-mail: jonghyock@gmail.com
*Min & Kim contributed equally to this work as joint first authors.
• Received: July 9, 2022   • Accepted: October 28, 2022

© 2022, Korean Society of Epidemiology

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

prev next
  • 6,005 Views
  • 134 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref
  • 5 Scopus
Full Article

Download PDF Download PDF

  • OBJECTIVES
    Studies on the association between disabilities and tuberculosis (TB) are scarce. We aimed to assess the risk of active TB disease among people with disabilities.
  • METHODS
    We conducted a nationwide serial cross-sectional study using national registry linkage databases from 2008 to 2017. The crude and age-standardized and sex-standardized incidence rates of TB were analyzed for each year according to the presence, type, and severity of disabilities. The crude incidence rate and odds of developing TB disease were examined with a multivariable logistic regression model using data from 2017.
  • RESULTS
    The overall incidence of active TB decreased between 2008 and 2017. The age- and sex-standardized incidence rates of TB disease among people with disabilities were significantly higher than among those without disabilities throughout all observed years (p<0.001). As of 2017, the population with disabilities had a higher crude incidence rate of active TB disease than that without disabilities (119.9/100,000 vs. 48.5/100,000 person-years, p<0.001), regardless of sex, income level, and place of residence. Compared to those without disabilities, those with disabilities had higher odds of active TB (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15 to 1.24). Individuals with mental disabilities (aOR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.24 to1.84) had the highest odds of active TB incidence, followed by those with developmental disabilities (aOR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.55).
  • CONCLUSIONS
    People with disabilities are at a greater risk of developing TB disease. Active screening and care for TB cases would be beneficial for people with disabilities.
  • Keywords: Intellectual disability, Mental disability, Incidence of tuberculosis, Risk, Vulnerable populations, Social determinants of health
Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the most life-threatening infectious diseases and poses a significant risk to global health security. Despite being preventable and curable, TB remains a major cause of poor health and mortality. The World Health Organization (WHO) End TB Strategy seeks to prevent and control TB and recommends systematic screening for TB disease in high-risk groups as a central component of its first pillar [1]. The aim of screening is to detect TB disease early to minimize avoidable delays in diagnosis and treatment, thereby reducing the risk of unfavorable treatment outcomes, health sequelae, and adverse social and economic consequences of TB for individuals and their families.
People with disabilities are often at a greater risk for both communicable and chronic non-communicable diseases. Disabilities are associated with a diverse range of primary health conditions, accidents, injuries, and contextual factors, which lead to a wide range of functional limitations, including mobility, sensory, mental, and communication disabilities [2]. People with disabilities may be more susceptible to developing other chronic conditions because of their underlying conditions and the influence of behavioral risk factors, such as increased physical inactivity [3]. Disabilities may cause and reinforce poverty [4], which increases the risk of functional loss through malnutrition, poor healthcare access, and dangerous living, working, and traveling conditions [5]. These factors and conditions of disability often overlap with the risk factors for developing TB disease.
Disabilities are a global public health issue because they affect an estimated 15% of the world’s population [2,6], with an increasing prevalence due to an increase in chronic health conditions and population aging. Despite being considered a marginalized subpopulation, studies on the vulnerability of people with disabilities to developing TB disease are insufficient. If disabilities are a risk factor for TB, their burden may act as a significant barrier to global TB elimination. Our study aimed to elucidate the association between disabilities and active TB incidence and to compare trends in annual TB incidence between people with and without disabilities using a large nationwide cross-linked database.
Study design and population
We conducted a nationwide serial cross-sectional study using linked national registry databases. We linked the National Disability Registration Database (NDRD) with the National Health Information Database (NHID) of Korea. The NHID is a public database on healthcare utilization, health screening, socio-demographic variables, and mortality for the entire Korean population, maintained by the Korean National Health Insurance Service [7]. From these data, we extracted information on socio-demographic variables.
The NDRD comprises data from the national registration system for people with disabilities, primarily for the provision of welfare benefits [8]. Registration requires the submission of appropriate and validated documentation to a local National Pension Service office. The paperwork includes appraised results of a disability diagnosis by a specialist physician in the corresponding field according to detailed criteria for the specific disability, as defined by the national disability registration system. From the NDRD, which covered 93.8% of the total population with disabilities in 2011 [9], we collected information on disabilities according to type and severity. The type and severity of disabilities were linked with the variables selected from the NHID using Korean personal identification numbers.
Data were anonymized by data holders before being accessed by the research team. We finally compiled cases involving people with disabilities between 2008 and 2017 using the NDRD (Supplementary Material 1).
Definition of active tuberculosis disease and disabilities
The incidence of active TB disease was identified using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), 10th revision, codes (A15-19), which were confirmed by prescriptions for ≥ 2 anti-TB drugs during a 30-day period [10]. Anti-TB drugs included isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol, pyrazinamide, amikacin, kanamycin, streptomycin, quinolones, thioamide, cycloserine, and para-aminosalicylic acid. To identify trends in the annual incidence of active TB between 2008 and 2017, we identified active TB cases for each calendar year in the entire Korean population. After excluding participants who were prescribed anti-TB drugs with a diagnosis of TB disease between 2006 and 2007, only participants with TB identified in 2008 were considered newly diagnosed cases in 2008. For the subsequent calendar years (2009-2017), only participants with TB who had not received anti-TB treatment in the previous 2 years were considered newly diagnosed cases.
There is no agreement on definitions and little internationally comparable information on the incidence of disabilities [2] and no information on disability incidence in the NDRD as well. Therefore, we operationally defined TB incidence in the disability group for each calendar year as any instance where the first disability registration date was earlier than the new diagnosis date of TB cases among people with disabilities in the NDRD. We also defined TB incidence in the disability group as occurring when the interval between these 2 dates was within 12 months, because it normally takes more than a year to register after disability incidence.
Independent variables
We collected data on factors that may influence the incidence of active TB, such as sex, age, income level, and place of residence. As a proxy measure for actual household income, we used insurance premium quartiles-first quartile (lowest), second quartile, third quartile, and fourth quartile (highest)-and the category of Medical Aid beneficiaries, as provided by the Korean National Health Insurance Service. The first quartile of income level included Medical Aid beneficiaries. Insurance premiums are calculated based on the income, property, and automobile taxes for each household. Residential areas were grouped into 3 categories (metropolitan, city, and rural) based on the Korean ZIP code.
Statistical analysis
In this serial cross-sectional study, we calculated the crude incidence rate of active TB for each calendar year from 2008 to 2017, plotted the annual incidence rates, and assessed the annual incidence trends between people with and without disabilities. The denominator of the annual incidence rate was defined as all the participants of the NHID identified in the corresponding year. The numerator was defined as those with active TB incidence in the same calendar year. The incidence rate of active TB was expressed as the number of active TB cases per 100,000 person-years. The age-standardized and sex-standardized incidence rate of active TB was also calculated using the direct standardization method. As subgroup analyses, we calculated the age-standardized and sex-standardized incidence rates of active TB according to the severity and type of disability. The NDRD defines 15 categories of disabilities. Disability severity is officially graded from 1 (very severe) to 6 (very mild) based on functional losses and clinical impairment, as determined by a medical specialist. In this study, disability severity was classified as severe (grades 1-3) or mild (grades 4-6).
Using data from all participants registered with the NHID in 2017, the most recent data available in our study, we described the general characteristics of the participants as follows. First, we compared the independent variables of people with and without disabilities in the 2017 data using descriptive statistics. Second, we identified the incidence of active TB and calculated the incidence rates among individuals with and without disabilities. Third, we stratified people with disabilities by severity and type and calculated the incidence rates in those groups. Fourth, we conducted a cross-sectional study to evaluate associations between disabilities and the development of active TB disease and performed logistic regression analysis using the 2017 data. We also developed a multivariable logistic regression model adjusted for age, sex, income level, and residence. In addition, multivariable logistic regression analysis stratified by severity and type of disability was performed. We conducted another subgroup analysis to assess the association between disability and TB incidence according to age (16-64 and ≥ 65 years). Unknown data were regarded as missing values. All analyses were performed using the SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Two-sided p-values of 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance.
Ethics statement
This study was conducted in accordance with the Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects, as outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol was approved by the International Review Board (IRB) of Chungbuk National University (IRB No. CBNU-202010-HRHR-0171). The requirement for informed consent was waived by the IRB because no patients were at risk.
The total number of enrolled participants with disabilities increased from 2,338,534 in 2008 to 2,627,365 in 2017 (Supplementary Material 1). The overall incidence of active TB among the populations with and without disabilities decreased between 2008 and 2017 (Figure 1A). The crude incidence rates of active TB among people with disabilities were significantly higher than those among people without disabilities throughout all the observed years, regardless of sex (p<0.001) (Supplementary Material 2). The age-standardized and sex-standardized incidence rates of active TB among people with and without disabilities revealed patterns similar to their crude incidence rates (Figure 1B). The age- and sex-standardized rates decreased for both mild and severe disabilities, along with a decrease in the gap between those groups (Figure 1C). Despite the dispersed TB incidence rates among different types of disabilities in 2008, the age- and sex-standardized rates tended to decrease in 2017 (Figure 1D).
The most recent dataset, from the 2017 calendar year, was used to describe the baseline characteristics of the enrolled participants with and without disabilities (Table 1). In 2017, males were significantly more represented among people with disabilities (58.0 vs. 49.7%, p<0.001). Participants with disabilities were also older (60.5±18.0 vs. 40.0±21.0 years, p<0.001). The disability group was more likely to report lower income and live in rural areas. Among participants with disabilities, 38.4% had a severe form of disability, with the most frequent type being physical disabilities (50.2%).
In 2017, active TB incidence was detected in 3,150 (0.12%) participants with disabilities and 24,290 (0.05%) participants without disabilities (Table 2). People with disabilities had a higher crude incidence rate of active TB disease than those without disabilities (119.9/100,000 vs. 48.5/100,000 person-years, p<0.001), regardless of sex, income level, and place of residence. The crude incidence rate of active TB in elderly participants aged ≥ 80 years was higher than that in other age groups, and there was no difference in the crude incidence rate between people with and without disabilities (p=0.740) in the ≥ 80-year group. The crude incidence rates of active TB in people with mild and severe disabilities were 107.3 and 127.7 per 100,000 person-years, respectively (Table 3). Among the various types of disabilities, those due to respiratory disease had the highest crude incidence rate of active TB (234.5/100,000 person-years).
In a univariable logistic regression analysis, people with disabilities had higher odds of active TB incidence than those without disabilities (odds ratio [OR], 2.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.38 to 2.57) (Table 4). Adjusting for sex, age, income level, and place of residence decreased the OR, but it still remained significant (adjusted OR [aOR], 1.19; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.24). The association between severe disability and TB incidence was slightly stronger (aOR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.29).
In the subgroup analysis, different types of disabilities revealed various associations with the incidence of TB. Participants with disabilities due to organ failure, such as those of the kidney, lung, heart, and liver, had high odds of developing active TB. The association between mental disabilities and TB incidence was significant in both univariable (OR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.81 to 2.69) and multivariable analyses (aOR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.24 to 1.84). Developmental disabilities were significantly associated with the incidence of TB after adjustment (aOR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.55). Another subgroup analysis stratified by age showed that the association between disability and TB incidence was stronger in the young age group (aOR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.27 to 1.44) than in the older age group (aOR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.16) (Table 5).
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to report that people with disabilities are at a higher risk of contracting TB disease. Although disabilities have been assumed to be a risk factor for TB disease owing to its relationship with low socioeconomic status and limited access to health care, no studies have investigated the association between disabilities and the subsequent risk of TB. We also identified several types of disabilities that are closely associated with TB. For example, people with mental and developmental disabilities are more prone to TB disease, which highlights the need for special attention and regular TB screening in these subgroups. In addition, we need to address various barriers that people with disabilities encounter while seeking care and adhering to treatment.
Despite global efforts to fight TB, the distribution of TB cases is unequal worldwide, with cases continuing to cluster among disadvantaged groups, such as the poor and minorities. A growing consensus indicates that progress in TB control requires action to address the social determinants of TB, along with investments in strengthening TB control programs. Weak social and economic policies and rapid urbanization are major upstream social determinants of TB epidemiology. These conditions give rise to an unequal distribution of social determinants of health, including food insecurity and malnutrition, poor housing and environmental conditions, and financial and cultural barriers to healthcare access. Disabilities and TB infection share these common social determinants of health, which generates a vicious cycle of disabilities and TB infection. The provision of public health interventions targeting disabilities and TB infection is only possible when we understand their links.
People from groups of low socioeconomic status are more likely to have more frequent contact with people with infectious TB [11]. Poverty and disabilities are believed to occur in a cycle [4]. Disabilities may lead to a lower standard of living and poverty through a lack of access to education and employment and through increased expenditures related to disabilities. Food insecurity and malnutrition are indirect poverty markers. The association between TB and undernutrition is well known [12]. Undernutrition diminishes one’s immune system, which increases the likelihood of developing active TB disease when infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis [13]. Individuals with disabilities often face significant issues related to malnutrition [14,15]. These shared features of poverty and undernutrition are causes of TB risk among people with disabilities.
Urbanization and population growth have led to increased population density and crowded living and working conditions. Households with a low socioeconomic status generally experience poorer indoor air quality [16]. These populations are likely at risk of developing TB due to weakened host defenses against the disease. Poor ventilation and overcrowding increase the likelihood of uninfected individuals being exposed to TB. Both indoor [17] and outdoor [18] air pollution are risk factors for developing TB. People with disabilities are more likely to face poor housing and work environments. For example, the levels of exposure to outdoor air pollution among children with intellectual disabilities are significantly higher than those among families of children without intellectual disabilities [19]. The association between disabilities and these social determinants and their effects on TB disease are another important agenda for future studies.
People with disabilities are at risk of developing chronic conditions, which are called secondary conditions [20] and also constitute risk factors for TB disease. They are more likely to experience unhealthy behaviors and risk factors for chronic diseases, such as an unhealthy diet, high blood pressure, obesity, and limited physical activity. These health risk behaviors increase the risk of diabetes among people with disabilities [21,22]. Diabetes, in turn, increases the risk of developing TB by approximately 3 times, doubles the risk of death during TB treatment, and increases the risk of other poor TB treatment outcomes [23]. Since multimorbidity is frequently observed among people with disabilities, active case finding for TB disease would be beneficial to those with chronic diseases, such as diabetes.
The annual TB incidence among people with and without disabilities decreased from 2008 to 2017. This could be ascribed to the continued efforts to fight TB in Korea during the last decade. We observed that the disabled also benefited from Korea’s successful national TB control programs, resulting in decreasing active TB incidence among people with disabilities. It is noteworthy that the TB incidence among people with disabilities suddenly rose between 2011 and 2012. This date coincides with the implementation of the national personal assistance service for people with disabilities, although the linkage between these 2 events cannot be directly confirmed due to a lack of evidence. However, given that the gastric cancer screening rate rose sharply in 2022 among people with severe disabilities who were the target population of the national personal assistant service, it would be reasonable to assume that the service had the effect [24]. In addition, the high proportion of the elderly among females with disabilities could account for differences in the age-standardized rates between sexes and its sharp increase among females with disabilities.
People with disabilities often face barriers in reaching TB care services [25]. A lack of information and knowledge about TB disease affects health-seeking behaviors and delays initial contact with the healthcare system. The pathways from screening to completing anti-TB treatment are more challenging. These issues apply not only to the disabled, but also to various vulnerable groups that are at risk of developing TB disease. Delays in TB diagnosis and treatment consequently impose a high risk of unfavorable outcomes [26]. The WHO’s End TB Strategy highlights the importance of patient-centered care, which involves systematically assessing and addressing patients’ needs and expectations [1]. Educational, emotional, and social support are essential for patients to complete diagnostic process and full course of anti-TB treatment. This approach is possible only with the collaboration of relevant governments, healthcare providers, components of civil society, and communities, such as public-private partnerships [27]. When preparing national TB control strategies, this approach to integrated, patent-centered care and prevention, especially for vulnerable populations, such as the disabled, should be considered.
Age is an important determinant of developing TB disease and shaping TB epidemiology [28]. Our subgroup analysis revealed that an association between disability and TB incidence was stronger among those aged between 16 years and 64 years than among the elderly population (aged 65 years and older). Our result implies that elderly people without disabilities possess similar risks of developing TB disease, to those with disabilities. This result can be explained by the fact that elderly individuals are more likely to have chronic comorbidities, which weaken the immune system and increase the likelihood that a latent TB infection progresses to active TB disease. It is important to include the elderly with fragility and comorbidities in definitions of vulnerable populations.
Our study has some limitations. First, because of the operational definition of active TB cases using ICD codes and prescriptions of anti-TB drugs, we could not capture patients who died without visiting hospitals or initiating anti-TB treatment in this study. In Korea, people with disabilities still have poor access to healthcare services [29], which might delay TB diagnosis and treatment and impose greater risks of mortality. People with severe disabilities who developed TB but could not visit hospitals for further management might not have been included in the study population. This would have caused an underestimation of the incidence of TB among people with disabilities. Second, our results cannot be applied to other settings with different healthcare systems. The welfare strategy and characteristics of disabled individuals in other countries are different from those in Korea; thus, more evidence from multi-ethnic studies is required to determine TB incidence among people with disabilities. Third, information on clinical and demographic variables that may influence TB progression was not available from the NHID.
The results of this study have several important implications. One of the strengths of this study is its large scale based on a national healthcare claims database in Korea. Second, no previous study has attempted to evaluate long-term trends in TB incidence among people with disabilities or provided a detailed analysis according to the grade and type of disability. Third, as opposed to other studies that used self-report questionnaires about disability, we used data from a national registry, which is an objective and reliable way to collect information.
In conclusion, our study revealed that people with disabilities are at greater risk of developing TB disease. Mental and developmental disabilities were significantly associated with TB. It is essential to actively screen for TB cases among people with disabilities who are at risk of developing TB to achieve the goals of the WHO’s End TB Strategy. Understanding the association between disabilities and TB is important for identifying barriers to TB services and preparing TB health policies and programs that target people with disabilities [30].
Supplementary materials are available at https://www.e-epih.org/.

Supplementary Material 1.

Flowchart of enrolled participants with and without disabilities between 2008 and 2017
epih-44-e2022098-Supplementary-1.docx

Supplementary Material 2

Incidence of active tuberculosis among participants with and without disabilities stratified by sex between 2008 and 2017
epih-44-e2022098-Supplementary-2.docx

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare for this study

FUNDING

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (No. 2022R1I1A3070074 and No. 2019R1D1A3A03103862).

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conceptualization: Min J, Kim SY, Park JE, Kim YY, Park JH. Funding acquisition: Kim SY, Park JH. Formal analysis: Kim SY, Park JE, Park JH. Writing-original draft: Min J, Kim SY, Park JH. Writing-review & editing: Min J, Kim SY, Park JE, Kim YY, Park JH.

None.
Figure 1.
Trends in tuberculosis incidence between 2008 and 2017 among participants with or without disabilities. (A) Crude rates stratified by sex. (B) Age- and sex-standardized rates stratified by sex. (C) Age- and sex-standardized rates stratified by severity of disability. (D) Age- and sex-standardized rates stratified by type of disability. PY, person-years.
epih-44-e2022098f1.jpg
epih-44-e2022098f2.jpg
Table 1.
Characteristics of enrolled participants with and without disabilities registered in 2017
Characteristics All participants (n=52,712,239) With disabilities (n=2,627,365) Without disabilities (n=50,084,874) p-value
Sex
Male 26,390,827 (50.1) 1,524,558 (58.0) 24,866,269 (49.7) <0.001
Female 26,321,412 (49.9) 1,102,807 (42.0) 25,218,605 (50.4)
Age, Mean±SD (yr) 41.0±21.3 60.5±18.0 40.0±21.0 <0.001
<30 16,840,651 (31.9) 184,853 (7.0) 16,655,798 (33.3) <0.001
30-39 7,634,258 (14.5) 143,358 (5.5) 7,490,900 (15.0)
40-49 8,788,690 (16.7) 286,639 (10.9) 8,502,051 (17.0)
50-59 8,583,409 (16.3) 510,958 (19.5) 8,072,451 (16.1)
60-69 5,723,391 (10.9) 572,848 (21.8) 5,150,543 (10.3)
70-79 3,423,916 (6.5) 578,206 (22.0) 2,845,710 (5.7)
≥80 1,717,924 (3.3) 350,503 (13.3) 1,367,421 (2.7)
Income level (quartile)
First 10,737,721 (20.4) 939,380 (35.8) 9,798,341 (19.6) <0.001
Second 10,521,266 (20.0) 397,980 (15.2) 10,123,286 (20.2)
Third 13,281,795 (25.2) 519,345 (19.8) 12,762,450 (25.5)
Fourth 17,363,650 (32.9) 747,816 (28.5) 16,615,834 (33.2)
Unknown 807,807 (1.5) 22,844 (0.90) 784,963 (1.6)
Residence
Metropolitan 32,887,108 (62.4) 1,437,919 (54.7) 31,449,189 (62.8) <0.001
City 15,279,505 (29.0) 818,874 (31.2) 14,460,631 (28.9)
Rural 4,519,094 (8.6) 370,566 (14.1) 4,148,528 (8.3)
Unknown 26,532 (0.1) 6 (0.0) 26,526 (0.1)

Values are presented as number (%).

SD, standard deviation.

Table 2.
Characteristics and incidence of active tuberculosis among participants with and without disabilities in 2017
Characteristics With disabilities (n=2,627,365)
 Without disabilities (n=50,084,874)
 p-value
n (%) PY IR1 n (%) PY IR1
All 3,150 (0.12) 2,627,365 119.9 24,290 (0.05) 50,084,874 48.5 <0.001
Sex
Male 1,901 (0.12) 1,524,558 124.7 13,608 (0.05) 24,866,269 54.7 <0.001
Female 1,249 (0.11) 1,102,807 113.3 10,682 (0.04) 25,218,605 42.4 <0.001
Age (yr)
<30 44 (0.02) 184,853 23.8 2,840 (0.02) 16,655,798 17.1 0.030
30-39 72 (0.05) 143,358 50.2 2,598 (0.03) 7,490,900 34.7 0.002
40-49 182 (0.06) 286,639 63.5 3,484 (0.04) 8,502,051 41.0 <0.001
50-59 468 (0.09) 510,958 91.6 4,578 (0.06) 8,072,451 56.7 <0.001
60-69 647 (0.11) 572,848 112.9 3,825 (0.07) 5,150,543 74.3 <0.001
70-79 933 (0.16) 578,206 161.4 3,869 (0.14) 2,845,710 136.0 <0.001
≥80 804 (0.23) 350,503 229.4 3,096 (0.23) 1,367,421 226.4 0.740
Income level (quartile)
First 1,147 (0.12) 939,380 122.1 6,032 (0.06) 9,798,341 61.6 <0.001
Second 464 (0.12) 397,980 116.6 5,158 (0.05) 10,123,286 51.0 <0.001
Third 596 (0.11) 519,345 114.8 5,702 (0.04) 12,762,450 44.7 <0.001
Fourth 914 (0.12) 747,816 122.2 7,075 (0.04) 16,615,834 42.6 <0.001
Unknown 29 (0.13) 22,844 126.9 323 (0.04) 784,963 41.1 <0.001
Residence
Metropolitan 1,548 (0.11) 1,437,919 107.7 14,241 (0.05) 31,449,189 45.3 <0.001
City 1,044 (0.13) 818,874 127.5 7,067 (0.05) 14,460,631 48.9 <0.001
Rural 558 (0.15) 370,566 150.6 2,973 (0.07) 4,148,528 71.7 <0.001

PY, person-years; IR, incidence rate.

1 IR per 100,000 PY.

Table 3.
Incidence of active TB stratified by grade and type of disability among participants with disabilities registered in 2017
Variables With disabilities n (col %) Active TB n (row %) PY IR
All 2,627,365 (100) 3,150 (0.12) 2,627,365 119.9
Severity of disability
Mild 1,618,856 (61.60) 1,082 (0.11) 1,008,509 107.3
Severe 1,008,509 (38.40) 2,068 (0.13) 1,618,856 127.7
Type of disability
Physical disability 1,319,712 (50.20) 1,532 (0.12) 1,319,712 116.1
Brain injury 258,610 (9.80) 257 (0.10) 258,610 99.4
Facial disability 2,725 (0.10) 1 (0.04) 2,725 36.7
Visual disability 259,423 (9.90) 319 (0.12) 259,423 123.0
Hearing and language disability 327,694 (12.50) 558 (0.17) 327,694 170.3
Developmental disability1 226,281 (8.60) 122 (0.05) 226,281 53.9
Mental disability 91,560 (3.50) 98 (0.11) 91,560 107.0
Renal disease 85,416 (3.30) 168 (0.20) 85,416 196.7
Heart disease 7,181 (0.30) 13 (0.18) 7,181 181.0
Respiratory disease 12,795 (0.50) 30 (0.23) 12,795 234.5
Liver disease 12,246 (0.50) 17 (0.14) 12,246 138.8
Ostomy 16,456 (0.60) 28 (0.17) 16,456 170.2
Epilepsy 7,266 (0.30) 7 (0.10) 7,266 96.3

TB, tuberculosis; PY, person-years; IR, incidence rate.

1 Developmental disabilities included intellectual disability and autism.

Table 4.
Logistic regression analysis of disability as a predictor of active tuberculosis incidence in 20171
Variables Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
OR (95% CI) aOR (95% CI) aOR (95% CI)
Status of disability
Without disability 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
With disability 2.47 (2.38, 2.57) 1.23 (1.18, 1.28) 1.19 (1.15, 1.24)
Severity of disability
Without disability 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
Mild disability 2.64 (2.52, 2.76) 1.21 (1.15, 1.26) 1.19 (1.13, 1.24)
Severe disability 2.21 (2.08, 2.35) 1.28 (1.20, 1.36) 1.21 (1.14, 1.29)
Type of disability
Without disability 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
Physical disability 2.40 (2.28, 2.52) 1.17 (1.11, 1.23) 1.14 (1.08, 1.20)
Brain injury 2.05 (1.81, 2.32) 0.92 (0.81, 1.04) 0.90 (0.80, 1.02)
Facial disability 0.76 (0.11, 5.37) 0.54 (0.08, 3.80) 0.51 (0.07, 3.60)
Visual disability 2.54 (2.27, 2.83) 1.19 (1.06, 1.33) 1.15 (1.03, 1.29)
Hearing and language disability 3.52 (3.23, 3.82) 1.30 (1.19, 1.42) 1.28 (1.18, 1.39)
Developmental disability2 1.11 (0.93, 1.33) 1.47 (1.23, 1.76) 1.30 (1.09, 1.55)
Mental disability 2.21 (1.81, 2.69) 1.72 (1.41, 2.10) 1.51 (1.24, 1.84)
Renal disease 4.06 (3.49, 4.73) 2.20 (1.89, 2.56) 2.16 (1.85, 2.51)
Heart disease 3.74 (2.17, 6.44) 1.79 (1.04, 3.08) 1.77 (1.03, 3.06)
Respiratory disease 4.84 (3.38, 6.93) 1.96 (1.37, 2.81) 1.91 (1.33, 2.73)
Liver disease 2.87 (1.78, 4.61) 1.74 (1.08, 2.80) 1.74 (1.08, 2.79)
Ostomy 3.51 (2.42, 5.09) 1.34 (0.93, 1.94) 1.33 (0.92, 1.93)
Epilepsy 1.99 (0.95, 4.17) 1.66 (0.79, 3.49) 1.50 (0.72, 3.15)

OR, odds ratio; aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

1 The second multivariable logistic regression model was adjusted for age (continuous) and sex; The third multivariable model was adjusted for age (continuous), sex, income level, and place of residence.

2 Developmental disabilities included intellectual disability and autism.

Table 5.
Logistic regression analysis of disabilities as a predictor of active tuberculosis incidence stratified by 2 age groups (16-64 and 65 years and older) in 20171
Variables Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
OR (95% CI) aOR (95% CI) aOR (95% CI)
Age, 16-64 (yr)
Status of disability
Without disability 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
With disability 1.87 (1.76, 1.99) 1.47 (1.38, 1.56) 1.35 (1.27, 1.44)
Severity of disability
Without disability 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
Mild disability 1.89 (1.74, 2.05) 1.39 (1.28, 1.51) 1.32 (1.22, 1.43)
Severe disability 1.85 (1.69, 2.03) 1.57 (1.43, 1.72) 1.39 (1.26, 1.52)
Age, ≥65 (yr)
Status of disability
Without disability 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
With disability 1.24 (1.18, 1.30) 1.12 (1.06, 1.17) 1.10 (1.05, 1.16)
Severity of disability
Without disability 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
Mild disability 1.25 (1.18, 1.32) 1.13 (1.07, 1.19) 1.11 (1.05, 1.18)
Severe disability 1.23 (1.13, 1.33) 1.09 (1.00, 1.18) 1.07 (0.99, 1.16)

OR, odds ratio; aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

1 The second multivariable logistic regression model was adjusted for age (continuous) and sex; The third multivariable model was adjusted for age (continuous), sex, income level, and place of residence.

  • 1. World Health Organization. Implementing the end TB strategy: the essentials; 2015 [cited 2023 Mar 6]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/206499.
  • 2. World Health Organization. World report on disability 2011. [cited 2023 Mar 6]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44575.
  • 3. Rimmer JH, Rowland JL. Health promotion for people with disabilities: implications for empowering the person and promoting disability-friendly environments. Am J Lifestyle Med 2008;2:409-420.ArticlePDF
  • 4. Banks LM, Kuper H, Polack S. Poverty and disability in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. PLoS One 2017;12:e0189996.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 5. Niessen LW, Mohan D, Akuoku JK, Mirelman AJ, Ahmed S, Koehlmoos TP, et al. Tackling socioeconomic inequalities and non-communicable diseases in low-income and middle-income countries under the Sustainable Development agenda. Lancet 2018;391:2036-2046.ArticlePubMed
  • 6. Iezzoni LI, Kurtz SG, Rao SR. Trends in U.S. adult chronic disability rates over time. Disabil Health J 2014;7:402-412.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 7. Seong SC, Kim YY, Khang YH, Park JH, Kang HJ, Lee H, et al. Data resource profile: the National Health Information Database of the National Health Insurance Service in South Korea. Int J Epidemiol 2017;46:799-800.PubMed
  • 8. Shin DW, Lee JW, Jung JH, Han K, Kim SY, Choi KS, et al. Disparities in cervical cancer screening among women with disabilities: a national database study in South Korea. J Clin Oncol 2018;36:2778-2786.ArticlePubMed
  • 9. Korean Statistical Information Service. National survey on persons with disabilities. [cited 2023 Mar 6]. Available from: https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=117&tblId=DT_11732S0103&conn_path=I2 (Korean).
  • 10. Min J, Kwon SK, Jeong HW, Han JH, Kim YJ, Kang M, et al. End-stage renal disease and risk of active tuberculosis: a nationwide population-based cohort study. J Korean Med Sci 2018;33:e341.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 11. Blas E, Sivasankara Kurup A; World Health Organization. Equity, social determinants and public health programmes; 2010 [cited 2023 Mar 6]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44289.
  • 12. Pakasi TA, Karyadi E, Dolmans WM, van der Meer JW, van der Velden K. Malnutrition and socio-demographic factors associated with pulmonary tuberculosis in Timor and Rote Islands, Indonesia. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2009;13:755-759.PubMed
  • 13. Cegielski JP, McMurray DN. The relationship between malnutrition and tuberculosis: evidence from studies in humans and experimental animals. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2004;8:286-298.PubMed
  • 14. Groce N, Challenger E, Berman-Bieler R, Farkas A, Yilmaz N, Schultink W, et al. Malnutrition and disability: unexplored opportunities for collaboration. Paediatr Int Child Health 2014;34:308-314.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 15. Lee DH, Kim SY, Park JE, Jeon HJ, Park JH, Kawachi I. Nationwide trends in prevalence of underweight, overweight, and obesity among people with disabilities in South Korea from 2008 to 2017. Int J Obes (Lond) 2022;46:613-622.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 16. Ferguson L, Taylor J, Davies M, Shrubsole C, Symonds P, Dimitroulopoulou S. Exposure to indoor air pollution across socio-economic groups in high-income countries: a scoping review of the literature and a modelling methodology. Environ Int 2020;143:105748.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 17. Sumpter C, Chandramohan D. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the associations between indoor air pollution and tuberculosis. Trop Med Int Health 2013;18:101-108.ArticlePubMed
  • 18. Hwang SS, Kang S, Lee JY, Lee JS, Kim HJ, Han SK, et al. Impact of outdoor air pollution on the incidence of tuberculosis in the Seoul metropolitan area, South Korea. Korean J Intern Med 2014;29:183-190.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 19. Emerson E, Robertson J, Hatton C, Baines S. Risk of exposure to air pollution among British children with and without intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res 2019;63:161-167.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 20. Marge M. Secondary conditions revisited: examining the expansion of the original concept and definition. Disabil Health J 2008;1:67-70.ArticlePubMed
  • 21. MacRae S, Brown M, Karatzias T, Taggart L, Truesdale-Kennedy M, Walley R, et al. Diabetes in people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review of the literature. Res Dev Disabil 2015;47:352-374.ArticlePubMed
  • 22. Jung I, Kwon H, Park SE, Han KD, Park YG, Rhee EJ, et al. The prevalence and risk of type 2 diabetes in adults with disabilities in Korea. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) 2020;35:552-561.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 23. van Crevel R, Critchley JA. The interaction of diabetes and tuberculosis: translating research to policy and practice. Trop Med Infect Dis 2021;6:8.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 24. Kim Y, Shin DW, Kim HW, Jung JH, Han K, Cho IY, et al. Disparities in gastric cancer screening among people with disabilities: a national registry-linkage study in South Korea. Gastric Cancer 2020;23:497-509.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 25. Grut L, Sanudi L, Braathen SH, Jürgens T, Eide AH. Access to tuberculosis services for individuals with disability in rural Malawi, a qualitative study. PLoS One 2015;10:e0122748.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 26. Kim SH, Min J, Cho JY, Kang H, Yang B, Shin YM, et al. Clinical profiles and outcomes of pulmonary tuberculosis patients with delayed treatment at a tertiary hospital in South Korea. Ann Palliat Med 2021;10:2948-2957.ArticlePubMed
  • 27. Min J, Kim HW, Ko Y, Oh JY, Kang JY, Lee J, et al. Tuberculosis surveillance and monitoring under the national public-private mix tuberculosis control project in South Korea 2016-2017. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul) 2020;83:218-227.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 28. Koo HK, Min J, Kim HW, Ko Y, Oh JY, Jeong YJ, et al. Cluster analysis categorizes five phenotypes of pulmonary tuberculosis. Sci Rep 2022;12:10084.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 29. Jeon B, Kwon S, Kim H. Health care utilization by people with disabilities: a longitudinal analysis of the Korea Welfare Panel Study (KoWePS). Disabil Health J 2015;8:353-362.ArticlePubMed
  • 30. Iezzoni LI. Policy concerns raised by the growing U.S. population aging with disability. Disabil Health J 2014;7(1 Suppl):S64-S68.ArticlePubMed

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • HIV knowledge and access to testing for people with and without disabilities in low‐ and middle‐income countries: evidence from 37 Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys
      Sara Rotenberg, Shanquan Chen, Jill Hanass‐Hancock, Calum Davey, Lena Morgon Banks, Hannah Kuper
      Journal of the International AIDS Society.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • The Korea National Disability Registration System
      Miso Kim, Wonyoung Jung, So Young Kim, Jong Hyock Park, Dong Wook Shin
      Epidemiology and Health.2023; 45: e2023053.     CrossRef
    • Nationwide Trends in Osteoporosis in Koreans With Disabilities From 2008 to 2017
      Ji Hyoun Kim, So Young Kim, Jong Eun Park, Hyo Jong Kim, Hyun Jeong Jeon, Yeon Yong Kim, Jong‐Hyock Park
      JBMR Plus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Growing disparity in the prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease between people with and without disabilities: a Korean nationwide serial cross-sectional study
      Jinsoo Min, Jong Eun Park, So Young Kim, Yeon Yong Kim, Jong Hyock Park
      Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef

    Figure
    • 0
    • 1
    Related articles
    Nationwide trends in the incidence of tuberculosis among people with disabilities in Korea: a nationwide serial cross-sectional study
    Image Image
    Figure 1. Trends in tuberculosis incidence between 2008 and 2017 among participants with or without disabilities. (A) Crude rates stratified by sex. (B) Age- and sex-standardized rates stratified by sex. (C) Age- and sex-standardized rates stratified by severity of disability. (D) Age- and sex-standardized rates stratified by type of disability. PY, person-years.
    Graphical abstract

    Figure 1.

    Graphical abstract

    Nationwide trends in the incidence of tuberculosis among people with disabilities in Korea: a nationwide serial cross-sectional study
    Characteristics All participants (n=52,712,239) With disabilities (n=2,627,365) Without disabilities (n=50,084,874) p-value
    Sex
    Male 26,390,827 (50.1) 1,524,558 (58.0) 24,866,269 (49.7) <0.001
    Female 26,321,412 (49.9) 1,102,807 (42.0) 25,218,605 (50.4)
    Age, Mean±SD (yr) 41.0±21.3 60.5±18.0 40.0±21.0 <0.001
    <30 16,840,651 (31.9) 184,853 (7.0) 16,655,798 (33.3) <0.001
    30-39 7,634,258 (14.5) 143,358 (5.5) 7,490,900 (15.0)
    40-49 8,788,690 (16.7) 286,639 (10.9) 8,502,051 (17.0)
    50-59 8,583,409 (16.3) 510,958 (19.5) 8,072,451 (16.1)
    60-69 5,723,391 (10.9) 572,848 (21.8) 5,150,543 (10.3)
    70-79 3,423,916 (6.5) 578,206 (22.0) 2,845,710 (5.7)
    ≥80 1,717,924 (3.3) 350,503 (13.3) 1,367,421 (2.7)
    Income level (quartile)
    First 10,737,721 (20.4) 939,380 (35.8) 9,798,341 (19.6) <0.001
    Second 10,521,266 (20.0) 397,980 (15.2) 10,123,286 (20.2)
    Third 13,281,795 (25.2) 519,345 (19.8) 12,762,450 (25.5)
    Fourth 17,363,650 (32.9) 747,816 (28.5) 16,615,834 (33.2)
    Unknown 807,807 (1.5) 22,844 (0.90) 784,963 (1.6)
    Residence
    Metropolitan 32,887,108 (62.4) 1,437,919 (54.7) 31,449,189 (62.8) <0.001
    City 15,279,505 (29.0) 818,874 (31.2) 14,460,631 (28.9)
    Rural 4,519,094 (8.6) 370,566 (14.1) 4,148,528 (8.3)
    Unknown 26,532 (0.1) 6 (0.0) 26,526 (0.1)
    Characteristics With disabilities (n=2,627,365)
    		 Without disabilities (n=50,084,874)
    		 p-value
    n (%) PY IR1 n (%) PY IR1
    All 3,150 (0.12) 2,627,365 119.9 24,290 (0.05) 50,084,874 48.5 <0.001
    Sex
    Male 1,901 (0.12) 1,524,558 124.7 13,608 (0.05) 24,866,269 54.7 <0.001
    Female 1,249 (0.11) 1,102,807 113.3 10,682 (0.04) 25,218,605 42.4 <0.001
    Age (yr)
    <30 44 (0.02) 184,853 23.8 2,840 (0.02) 16,655,798 17.1 0.030
    30-39 72 (0.05) 143,358 50.2 2,598 (0.03) 7,490,900 34.7 0.002
    40-49 182 (0.06) 286,639 63.5 3,484 (0.04) 8,502,051 41.0 <0.001
    50-59 468 (0.09) 510,958 91.6 4,578 (0.06) 8,072,451 56.7 <0.001
    60-69 647 (0.11) 572,848 112.9 3,825 (0.07) 5,150,543 74.3 <0.001
    70-79 933 (0.16) 578,206 161.4 3,869 (0.14) 2,845,710 136.0 <0.001
    ≥80 804 (0.23) 350,503 229.4 3,096 (0.23) 1,367,421 226.4 0.740
    Income level (quartile)
    First 1,147 (0.12) 939,380 122.1 6,032 (0.06) 9,798,341 61.6 <0.001
    Second 464 (0.12) 397,980 116.6 5,158 (0.05) 10,123,286 51.0 <0.001
    Third 596 (0.11) 519,345 114.8 5,702 (0.04) 12,762,450 44.7 <0.001
    Fourth 914 (0.12) 747,816 122.2 7,075 (0.04) 16,615,834 42.6 <0.001
    Unknown 29 (0.13) 22,844 126.9 323 (0.04) 784,963 41.1 <0.001
    Residence
    Metropolitan 1,548 (0.11) 1,437,919 107.7 14,241 (0.05) 31,449,189 45.3 <0.001
    City 1,044 (0.13) 818,874 127.5 7,067 (0.05) 14,460,631 48.9 <0.001
    Rural 558 (0.15) 370,566 150.6 2,973 (0.07) 4,148,528 71.7 <0.001
    Variables With disabilities n (col %) Active TB n (row %) PY IR
    All 2,627,365 (100) 3,150 (0.12) 2,627,365 119.9
    Severity of disability
    Mild 1,618,856 (61.60) 1,082 (0.11) 1,008,509 107.3
    Severe 1,008,509 (38.40) 2,068 (0.13) 1,618,856 127.7
    Type of disability
    Physical disability 1,319,712 (50.20) 1,532 (0.12) 1,319,712 116.1
    Brain injury 258,610 (9.80) 257 (0.10) 258,610 99.4
    Facial disability 2,725 (0.10) 1 (0.04) 2,725 36.7
    Visual disability 259,423 (9.90) 319 (0.12) 259,423 123.0
    Hearing and language disability 327,694 (12.50) 558 (0.17) 327,694 170.3
    Developmental disability1 226,281 (8.60) 122 (0.05) 226,281 53.9
    Mental disability 91,560 (3.50) 98 (0.11) 91,560 107.0
    Renal disease 85,416 (3.30) 168 (0.20) 85,416 196.7
    Heart disease 7,181 (0.30) 13 (0.18) 7,181 181.0
    Respiratory disease 12,795 (0.50) 30 (0.23) 12,795 234.5
    Liver disease 12,246 (0.50) 17 (0.14) 12,246 138.8
    Ostomy 16,456 (0.60) 28 (0.17) 16,456 170.2
    Epilepsy 7,266 (0.30) 7 (0.10) 7,266 96.3
    Variables Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
    OR (95% CI) aOR (95% CI) aOR (95% CI)
    Status of disability
    Without disability 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
    With disability 2.47 (2.38, 2.57) 1.23 (1.18, 1.28) 1.19 (1.15, 1.24)
    Severity of disability
    Without disability 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
    Mild disability 2.64 (2.52, 2.76) 1.21 (1.15, 1.26) 1.19 (1.13, 1.24)
    Severe disability 2.21 (2.08, 2.35) 1.28 (1.20, 1.36) 1.21 (1.14, 1.29)
    Type of disability
    Without disability 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
    Physical disability 2.40 (2.28, 2.52) 1.17 (1.11, 1.23) 1.14 (1.08, 1.20)
    Brain injury 2.05 (1.81, 2.32) 0.92 (0.81, 1.04) 0.90 (0.80, 1.02)
    Facial disability 0.76 (0.11, 5.37) 0.54 (0.08, 3.80) 0.51 (0.07, 3.60)
    Visual disability 2.54 (2.27, 2.83) 1.19 (1.06, 1.33) 1.15 (1.03, 1.29)
    Hearing and language disability 3.52 (3.23, 3.82) 1.30 (1.19, 1.42) 1.28 (1.18, 1.39)
    Developmental disability2 1.11 (0.93, 1.33) 1.47 (1.23, 1.76) 1.30 (1.09, 1.55)
    Mental disability 2.21 (1.81, 2.69) 1.72 (1.41, 2.10) 1.51 (1.24, 1.84)
    Renal disease 4.06 (3.49, 4.73) 2.20 (1.89, 2.56) 2.16 (1.85, 2.51)
    Heart disease 3.74 (2.17, 6.44) 1.79 (1.04, 3.08) 1.77 (1.03, 3.06)
    Respiratory disease 4.84 (3.38, 6.93) 1.96 (1.37, 2.81) 1.91 (1.33, 2.73)
    Liver disease 2.87 (1.78, 4.61) 1.74 (1.08, 2.80) 1.74 (1.08, 2.79)
    Ostomy 3.51 (2.42, 5.09) 1.34 (0.93, 1.94) 1.33 (0.92, 1.93)
    Epilepsy 1.99 (0.95, 4.17) 1.66 (0.79, 3.49) 1.50 (0.72, 3.15)
    Variables Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
    OR (95% CI) aOR (95% CI) aOR (95% CI)
    Age, 16-64 (yr)
    Status of disability
    Without disability 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
    With disability 1.87 (1.76, 1.99) 1.47 (1.38, 1.56) 1.35 (1.27, 1.44)
    Severity of disability
    Without disability 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
    Mild disability 1.89 (1.74, 2.05) 1.39 (1.28, 1.51) 1.32 (1.22, 1.43)
    Severe disability 1.85 (1.69, 2.03) 1.57 (1.43, 1.72) 1.39 (1.26, 1.52)
    Age, ≥65 (yr)
    Status of disability
    Without disability 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
    With disability 1.24 (1.18, 1.30) 1.12 (1.06, 1.17) 1.10 (1.05, 1.16)
    Severity of disability
    Without disability 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
    Mild disability 1.25 (1.18, 1.32) 1.13 (1.07, 1.19) 1.11 (1.05, 1.18)
    Severe disability 1.23 (1.13, 1.33) 1.09 (1.00, 1.18) 1.07 (0.99, 1.16)
    Table 1. Characteristics of enrolled participants with and without disabilities registered in 2017

    Values are presented as number (%).

    SD, standard deviation.

    Table 2. Characteristics and incidence of active tuberculosis among participants with and without disabilities in 2017

    PY, person-years; IR, incidence rate.

    IR per 100,000 PY.

    Table 3. Incidence of active TB stratified by grade and type of disability among participants with disabilities registered in 2017

    TB, tuberculosis; PY, person-years; IR, incidence rate.

    Developmental disabilities included intellectual disability and autism.

    Table 4. Logistic regression analysis of disability as a predictor of active tuberculosis incidence in 20171

    OR, odds ratio; aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

    The second multivariable logistic regression model was adjusted for age (continuous) and sex; The third multivariable model was adjusted for age (continuous), sex, income level, and place of residence.

    Developmental disabilities included intellectual disability and autism.

    Table 5. Logistic regression analysis of disabilities as a predictor of active tuberculosis incidence stratified by 2 age groups (16-64 and 65 years and older) in 20171

    OR, odds ratio; aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

    The second multivariable logistic regression model was adjusted for age (continuous) and sex; The third multivariable model was adjusted for age (continuous), sex, income level, and place of residence.

    Table 1.

    Table 2.

    Table 3.

    Table 4.

    Table 5.

    Epidemiol Health : Epidemiology and Health
    © Korean Society of Epidemiology.
    TOP