 |
| CrossRef Text and Data Mining |
| Result of CrossRef Text and Data Mining Search is the related articles with entitled article. If you click link1 or link2 you will be able to reach the full text site of selected articles; however, some links do not show the full text immediately at now. If you click CrossRef Text and Data Mining Download icon, you will be able to get whole list of articles from literature included in CrossRef Text and Data Mining. |
| Epidemiological evidence in law: a comment on Supreme Court Decision 2011Da22092, South Korea |
| Alex Broadbent |
|
Epidemiol Health. 2015;37:e2015025 Published online May 31, 2015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4178/epih/e2015025 |
|
Supreme Court Decision Making The Supreme Court in the American Legal System. 2005;299-331  Comment on the Italian Supreme Court Decision “Vespa” IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. 2018;49(3):373-378 Patent Limitation During Infringement Proceedings – Comment on the Japanese Supreme Court Decision, “Sheet Cutter” IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. 2018;49(2):250-254 Comment on the German Federal Supreme Court Decision “Raltegravir” IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. 2017;49(1):125-130 Comment on the US Supreme Court Decision “Impression Products v. Lexmark International” IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. 2017;48(7):889-896 Fountain Pens and Typewriters: Supreme Court Stenographers and Law Clerks, 1910-1940 Journal of Supreme Court History. 2016;41(1):39-71 Comment on “Verkkokauppa.com” IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. 2015;46(8):995-998 Comment on “Central Negotiating Mandate” IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. 2016;47(3):373-381 U.S. Government Supports Supreme Court Review of Texas Decision American Journal of International Law. 2007;101(2):480-483 Comment on the Judgment of the Danish Supreme Court Decision – Coop v. K.H. Würtz, Case 171/2017 IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. 2019;51(1):128-136 |
