Cryptosporidium Oocyst Detection in Water Samples: Floatation Technique Enhanced with Immunofluorescence Is as Effective as Immunomagnetic Separation Method
Khuanchai Koompapong,1Chantira Sutthikornchai,1
and Yowalark Sukthana1,2
1Department of Protozoology, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
2Mahidol University International College, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Received April 17, 2009; Revised August 02, 2009; Accepted August 21, 2009.
Abstract
Cryptosporidium can cause gastrointestinal diseases worldwide, consequently posing public health problems and economic burden. Effective techniques for detecting contaminated oocysts in water are important to prevent and control the contamination. Immunomagnetic separation (IMS) method has been widely employed recently due to its efficiency, but, it is costly. Sucrose floatation technique is generally used for separating organisms by using their different specific gravity. It is effective and cheap but time consuming as well as requiring highly skilled personnel. Water turbidity and parasite load in water sample are additional factors affecting to the recovery rate of those 2 methods. We compared the efficiency of IMS and sucrose floatation methods to recover the spiked Cryptosporidium oocysts in various turbidity water samples. Cryptosporidium oocysts concentration at 1, 101, 102, and 103 per 10 µl were spiked into 3 sets of 10 ml-water turbidity (5, 50, and 500 NTU). The recovery rate of the 2 methods was not different. Oocyst load at the concentration < 102 per 10 ml yielded unreliable results. Water turbidity at 500 NTU decreased the recovery rate of both techniques. The combination of sucrose floatation and immunofluorescense assay techniques (SF-FA) showed higher recovery rate than IMS and immunofluorescense assay (IMS-FA). We used this SF-FA to detect Cryptosporidium and Giardia from the river water samples and found 9 and 19 out of 30 (30% and 63.3%) positive, respectively. Our results favored sucrose floatation technique enhanced with immunofluorescense assay for detecting contaminated protozoa in water samples in general laboratories and in the real practical setting.
Feng YY,Ong SL,Hu JY,Song LF,Tan XL,Ng WJ. Effect of particles on the recovery of Cryptosporidium oocysts from source water samples of various turbidities. Appl Environ Microbiol 2003;69:1898–1903.
2.
Kuczynska E,Boyer DG,Shelton DR. Comparison of immunofluorescence assay and immunomagnetic electrochemiluminescence in detection of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in karst water samples. J Microbiol Methods 2003;53:17–26.
3.
Fujino T,Matsuo T,Okada M,Matsui T. Detection of a small number of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts by sugar floatation and sugar centrifugation methods. J Vet Med Sci 2006;68:1191–1193.
4.
LeChevallier MW,Di Giovanni GD,Clancy JL,Bukhari Z,Bukhari S,Rosen JS,Sobrinho J,Frey MM. Comparison of method 1623 and cell culture-PCR for detection of Cryptosporidium spp. in source waters. Appl Environ Microbiol 2003;69:971–979.
5.
Miller WA,Lewis DJ,Pereira MD,Lennox M,Conrad PA,Tate KW,Atwill ER. Farm factors associated with reducing Cryptosporidium loading in storm runoff from dairies. J Environ Qual 2008;37:1875–1882.
6.
Downey AS,Graczyk TK. Maximizing recovery and detection of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts from spiked eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica) tissue samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007;73:6910–6915.
7.
Sacco C,Bianchi M,Lorini C,Burrini D,Berchielli S,Lanciotti E. [Removal of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in drinking water treatment in a Tuscan area]. Ann Ig 2006;18:117–126.
8.
Iacovski RB,Barardi CR,Simões CM. Detection and enumeration of Cryptosporidium sp. oocysts in sewage sludge samples from the city of Florianópolis (Brazil) by using immunomagnetic separation combined with indirect immunofluorescence assay. Waste Manag Res 2004;22:171–176.
9.
Chesnot T,Schwartzbrod J. Quantitative and qualitative comparison of density-based purification methods for detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in turbid environmental matrices. J Microbiol Methods 2004;58:375–386.
10.
Ware MW,Wymer L,Lindquist HD,Schaefer FW 3rd. Evaluation of an alternative IMS dissociation procedure for use with Method 1622: Detection of Cryptosporidium in water. J Microbiol Methods 2003;55:575–583.
11.
Bonadonna L,Briancesco R,Ottaviani M,Veschetti E. Occurrence of Cryptosporidium oocysts in sewage effluents and correlation with microbial, chemical and physical water variables. Environ Monit Assess 2002;75:241–252.
12.
Campbell A,Smith H. Immunomagnetic separation of Cryptosporidium oocysts from water samples: Round robin comparison of techniques. Water Sci Technol 1997;35:397–401.
13.
McNabb SJ,Hansel DM,Welch DF,Heijbel H,McKee GL,Istre GR. Comparison of sedimentation and floatation techniques for identification of Cryptosporidium sp. oocysts in a large outbreak of human diarrhea. J Clin Microbiol 1985;22:587–589.
14.
Muchiri JM,Ascolillo L,Mugambi M,Mutwiri T,Ward HD,Naumova EN,Egorov AI,Cohen S,Else JG,Griffiths JK. Seasonality of Cryptosporidium oocyst detection in surface waters of Meru, Kenya as determined by two isolation methods followed by PCR. J Water Health 2009;7:67–75.
15.
Kuhn RC,Rock CM,Oshima KH. Effect of pH and magnetic material on immunomagnetic separation of Cryptosporidium oocysts from concentrated water samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 2002;68:2066–2070.
16.
Yakub GP,Stadterman-Knauer KL. Evaluation of immunomagnetic separation for recovery of Cryptosporidium parvum and Giardia duodinalis from high-iron matrices. Appl Environ Microbiol 2000;66:3628–3631.
17.
Rodgers MR,Flanigan DJ,Jakubowski W. Identification of algae which interfere with the detection of Giardia cysts and Cryptosporidium oocysts and a method for alleviating this interference. Appl Environ Microbiol 1995;61:3759–3763.
18.
Sutthikornchai C,Jantanavivat C,Thongrungkiat S,Harnroongroj T,Sukthana Y. Protozoal contamination of water used in Thai frozen food industry. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2005;36 suppl:41–45.
1,2
